Added acknowledgments

thesis/sections/conclusion.tex

@@ -7,3 +7,7 @@ It has also been proven that the most common instantiations Ed25519 and Ed448 pr
 Moreover, it has been proven that the signature scheme does not lose much of its security considering a multi-user setting. More specific, with a generous assumption of the existence of $2^{35} (\approx 35 \text{ billion})$ public keys the scheme loses only one bit of security.
 
 According to the results of this thesis, the EdDSA proved to be a secure signature scheme and that the modifications done to the original Schnorr signature scheme have very little affect on the security of the signature scheme. In fact, the only noticeable loss in security was introduced by the clamping of the private key.
+
+\paragraph{Acknowledgments}
+
+Many thanks to Dominik Hartmann and Eike Kiltz for the many discussions that helped me during this thesis.