split EdDSA Sigantures into own file
This commit is contained in:
99
thesis/sections/eddsa.tex
Normal file
99
thesis/sections/eddsa.tex
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
|
||||
\section{EdDSA Signatures}
|
||||
|
||||
% TODO: Referenz zum ersten Paper 2011 oder lieber zum journal paper 2012?
|
||||
|
||||
This section takes a closer look at the existing specifications of the EdDSA signature scheme and specifies a version which will be analyzed in this thesis.
|
||||
|
||||
This work will take a closer look at the \cma security of the EdDSA signature scheme. EdDSA was introduced as the Ed25519 signature scheme using the twisted Edwards curve Edwards25519, which is birationally equivalent to the Weierstrass curve Curve25519 \cite{JCEng:BDLSY12}. Later in 2015 the paper "EdDSA for more Curves" by Bernstein et al. introduces a more general version of EdDSA \cite{EPRINT:BJLSY15}. The paper also introduces a variant of EdDSA using prehashing. The RFC 8032 "Edwards-Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA)" from 2017 specifies a version of EdDSA with the inclusion of an additional input parameter \textit{context} for the \sign and \verify procedure \cite{josefsson_edwards-curve_2017}. This version was also included into the FIPS 186-5 "Digital Signature Standard (DSS)" standard \cite{moody_digital_2023}.
|
||||
|
||||
In the prehashing variant of EdDSA the signature is calculated on the hash value of the message. The message is used twice during the generation of the signature. Thus the message needs to be buffered or transmitted twice during the generation of the signature. Therefore the prehashing variant offers an performance advantage on memory and bandwidth constraint devices. The context is an additional input parameter which has to be equal during generation and verification of the signature and is used to bind the signature to a given context.
|
||||
|
||||
Figure \ref{fig:eddsa} defines the EdDSA signature scheme. In this version the prehashing of the message is ommited since the main security proof will focus on the EdDSA version without prehashing. In this case the prehash function $H'(\inp)$ is the identity function. After proofing the security of the EdDSA signature scheme without prehashing it will be shown that EdDSA with prehashing is equally as secure assuming collision resistence of the prehash function $H'(\inp)$.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{EdDSA Parameter}
|
||||
|
||||
The generic version of EdDSA from the "EdDSA for more Curves" paper, the RFC 8032 and the FIPS 186-5 standard is parameterized by the following 11 parameters \cite{EPRINT:BJLSY15} \cite{josefsson_edwards-curve_2017} \cite{moody_digital_2023}.
|
||||
|
||||
The list of the parameters can be found in table \ref{tab:parameter}.
|
||||
|
||||
The encoding function is assumed to be unambiguous. With each point on the twisted Edwards curve having exactly one bitstring representing that point and invalid bitstring being rejected during decoding of the point.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Differences from Schnorr Signatures}
|
||||
|
||||
As already pointed out in \cite{SP:BCJZ21} there are some minor differences from traditional Schnorr signature which prevent already existing proofs of the Schnorr signature scheme to be applied to EdDSA. This section points out the differences of the EdDSA signature scheme from traditional Schnorr signature scheme.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Group Structure}
|
||||
|
||||
The EdDSA signature scheme is defined using a twisted Edwards curve. Twisted Edwards curves always have a cofactor of at least 4. Traditional Schnorr signatures are constructed over a prime order field. Since there is no explicit check that points provided to the verify procedure resides in the prime order subgroup the standard proof of Schnorr signature schemes does not apply.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Private Key Clamping}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Key Prefixing}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Deterministic Nonce Generation}
|
||||
|
||||
% TODO: Ist das ok hier einfach zu kopieren?
|
||||
\begin{center}
|
||||
\begin{table}[t]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{@{}lX@{}}
|
||||
\textbf{Parameter} & \textbf{Description} \\
|
||||
\hline
|
||||
$q$ & An odd prime power $q$. EdDSA uses an elliptic curve over the finite field $\field{q}$. \\
|
||||
$b$ & An integer $b$ with $2^{b-1} > q$. The bit size of encoded points on the twisted Edwards curve. \\
|
||||
$Enc(\inp)$ & A $(b-1)$-bit encoding of elements in the underlying finite field. \\
|
||||
$H(\inp)$ & A cryptographic hash function producing $2b$-bit output. \\
|
||||
$c$ & The cofactor of the twisted Edwards curve. \\
|
||||
$n$ & The number of bits used for the secret scalar of the public key. \\
|
||||
$a, d$ & The curve parameter of the twisted Edwards curve. \\
|
||||
$B$ & A generator point of the prime order subgroup of $E$. \\
|
||||
$L$ & The order of the prime order subgroup. \\
|
||||
$H'(\inp)$ & A prehash function applied to the message prior to applying the \sign or \verify procedure.
|
||||
\end{tabularx}
|
||||
\caption{Parameter of the EdDSA signature scheme}
|
||||
\label{tab:parameter}
|
||||
\end{table}
|
||||
\end{center}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\hrule
|
||||
\begin{multicols}{3}
|
||||
\scriptsize
|
||||
\begin{algorithmic}[1]
|
||||
\Procedure{KeyGen}{}
|
||||
\State $k \randomsample \{0,1\}^b$
|
||||
\State $(h_0, h_1, ..., h_{2b-1}) \assign H(k)$
|
||||
\State $s \leftarrow 2^n + \sum_{i=c}^{n-1} 2^i h_i$
|
||||
\State $A \assign sB$
|
||||
\State \Return (\encoded{$A$}, $k$)
|
||||
\EndProcedure
|
||||
\end{algorithmic}
|
||||
\columnbreak
|
||||
\begin{algorithmic}[1]
|
||||
\Procedure{Sign}{$k$, $m$}
|
||||
\State $(h_0, h_1, ..., h_{2b-1}) \assign H(k)$
|
||||
\State $s \leftarrow 2^n + \sum_{i=c}^{n-1} 2^i h_i$
|
||||
\State $(r'_0, r'_1, ..., r'_{2b-1}) \assign H(h_b | ... | b_{2b-1} | m)$
|
||||
\State $r \assign \sum_{i=0}^{2b-1} 2^i r'_i$
|
||||
\State $R \assign rB$
|
||||
\State $S \assign (r + sH(\encoded{R} | \encoded{A} | m)) \pmod l$
|
||||
\State \Return $\sigma \assign (\encoded{R}, S)$
|
||||
\EndProcedure
|
||||
\end{algorithmic}
|
||||
\columnbreak
|
||||
\begin{algorithmic}[1]
|
||||
\Procedure{Verify}{$\encoded{A}, \sigma \assign (\encoded{R}, S), m$}
|
||||
\State \Return $2^c SB \\= 2^c R + 2^c H(\encoded{R} | \encoded{A} | m)A$
|
||||
\EndProcedure
|
||||
\end{algorithmic}
|
||||
\end{multicols}
|
||||
\hrule
|
||||
\caption{Generic description of the algorithms \keygen, \sign and \verify used by the EdDSA signature scheme}
|
||||
\label{fig:eddsa}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Replacing Hash Function Calls}
|
||||
|
||||
To make working with the random oracle easier in the following proofs some calls to the hash function are being replaced with calls to a pseudo random generator and a pseudo random function. After that it will be shown that the advantage winning the \cma game of both versions of the signature scheme is roughly the same.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user